The Supreme Court can help restrain excessive nationwide injunctions, but only Congress can fix the problem at its roots.

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Trump v. CASA, Inc. Though the case arises out of ...

The first week of the criminal trial for media mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs wrapped up after an emotional testimony from his ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments about injunctions against Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship for those born to ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday seemed open to lifting a series of nationwide orders blocking President Donald Trump from ...

The Supreme Court showed uncertainty over how to limit nationwide injunctions in a case stemming from blocks to President ...

The patriots of 1776 did not rebel against the tyranny of King George III only to subject themselves to the black-robed ...

The Supreme Court seemed intent Thursday on maintaining a block on President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright ...

The Supreme Court seemed divided over eliminating judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions at blockbuster oral ...

Federal courts have so far uniformly blocked President Donald Trump’s order seeking to end birthright citizenship for ...

In the 1960s, however, some judges invented a new tool called a universal injunction to impose their will on the country.

The court’s decision should reveal how justices will determine which nationwide injunctions are allowed and which are ...