Beneath the technical arguments at the Supreme Court last week was an effort to take away one of the only really effective ...

Republican President Donald Trump raised the stakes again Friday when he attacked the U.S. Supreme Court for its ruling ...

In the 1960s, however, some judges invented a new tool called a universal injunction to impose their will on the country.

A federal appeals court on Friday declined to lift a nationwide injunction that blocks Trump's plans to summarily deport ...

As Trump’s intent to override the courts get more obvious, a legal commentator who closely observes MAGA lawlessness explains ...

The Supreme Court can help restrain excessive nationwide injunctions, but only Congress can fix the problem at its roots.

The decision will also potentially reshape the power of federal judges to block presidential policies nationwide.

The Supreme Court could create a patchwork of citizenship rules that echoes a dark time in the nation's history.

Eight justices—the exception being Ketanji Brown Jackson—seem keen to rein in universal injunctions. But a majority also ...

The first week of the criminal trial for media mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs wrapped up after an emotional testimony from his ...

The freedom to ask tough questions. To go where news is happening. To tell the truth even when it makes people mad.

Supreme Court justices appeared divided on the issue of national injunctions. NPR's Scott Detrow discusses what the Court might do with law professor Nicholas Bagley.